Glass ionomer cements can be used for bonding orthodontic brackets after cancer radiation treatment?

Abstract Patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment present more susceptibility to dental caries and the use of an orthodontic device increases this risk factor due to biofilm accumulation around the brackets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to irradiated permanent teeth of orthodontic brackets bonded with conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement due to the fluoride release capacity of these materials. Ninety prepared human premolars were divided into 6 groups (n=15), according to the bonding material and use or not of radiation: CR: Transbond XT composite resin; RMGIC: Fuji Ortho LC conventional glass ionomer cement; GIC: Ketac Cem Easymix resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The groups were irradiated (I) or non-irradiated (NI) prior to bracket bonding. The specimens were subjected to a fractioned radiation dose of 2 Gy over 5 consecutive days for 6 weeks. After the radiotherapy, the brackets were bonded on the specimens with Transbond XT, Fuji Ortho LC and Ketac Cem Easymix. After 24 h, the specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test. The image of enamel surface (classified by Adhesive Remnant Index - ARI) was also evaluated and its frequency was checked among groups/subgroups. The shear bond strength variable was evaluated with ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. GIC group showed the lowest adhesion values among the groups (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference among non-irradiated and irradiated groups (p>0.05). As for the ARI, the CR-I group showed the highest material retention on enamel surface among the irradiated groups. RMGIC group showed the highest values for shear bond strength and presented ARI acceptable for clinical practices.

Resumo Pacientes submetidos a tratamento radioterápico apresentam maior suscetibilidade à cárie dentária e o uso de aparelho aumenta esse fator de risco devido ao acúmulo de biofilme dental ao redor dos bráquetes. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes ortodônticos colados com cimento de ionômero de vidro convencional (CIV) e o modificado por resina (CIVMR), devido à capacidade de liberação de flúor desse material em dentes permanentes irradiados. Noventa pré-molares humanos foram divididos em 6 grupos (n=15), de acordo com o materila de colagem e com o uso ou não de radiação: RC: Transbond XT; CIVMR: Fuji Ortho LC; RMGIC: Ketac Cem Easymix. Os grupos for irradiados (I) ou não-irradiados (NI) previamente à colagem dos bráquetes. Os espécimes foram submetidos a doses fracionadas de radiação de 2 Gy/dia, durante 5 dias consecutivos, por 6 semanas. Depois da termociclagem e radioterapia, os bráquetes foram colados sobre os espécimes com Transbond XT, Fuji Ortho LC e Ketac Cem Easymix. Depois de 24 h, os espécimes foram sumetidos ao teste de resistência ao cisalhamento. A imagem da superfície do esmalte (classificado pelo Índice de Remanescente Adesivo-IRA) também foi avaliada. O IRA foi distribuido em tabelas de contingência e analisado quanto à frequência entre grupos/subgrupos. O teste de resistência ao cisalhamento foi avaliado por ANOVA e pós-teste de Tukey. CIVMR apresentou os menores valores de adesão entre os grupos (p<0,05). Entre os grupos irradiados e não-irradiados não houve diferença estatística significante (p>0,05). Quanto ao IRA, RC-I apresentou maior retenção de compósito na superfície do esmalte do que os demais subgrupos. CIVMR pode ser utilizado para colagem de bráquetes metálico e apresentou IRA aceitável para práticas clínicas.

Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites

Abstract: The effects of tooth brushing could affect the long-term esthetic outcome of composite restorations. This study evaluated the effect of two different emission spectrum light-curing units on the surface roughness, roughness profile, topography and microhardness of bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Valo (multiple-peak) and Demi Ultra (single-peak) curing lights were each used for 10s to polymerize three bulk-fill resin composites: Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET) and Surefil SDR Flow (SDR). After 30,000 reciprocal strokes in a toothbrushing machine, the roughness profile, surface roughness, surface morphology, and microhardness were examined. Representative SEM images were also obtained. When light-cured with the Demi Ultra, SDR showed the most loss in volume compared to the other composites and higher volume loss compared to when was light-cured with Valo. The highest surface roughness and roughness profile values were found in SDR after toothbrushing, for both light-curing units tested. FBF always had the greatest microhardness values. Light-curing TET with Valo resulted in higher microhardness compared to when using the Demi Ultra. Confocal and SEM images show that toothbrushing resulted in smoother surfaces for FBF and TET. All composites exhibited surface volume loss after toothbrushing. The loss in volume of SDR depended on the light-curing unit used. Toothbrushing can alter the surface roughness and superficial aspect of some bulk-fill composites. The choice of light-curing unit did not affect the roughness profile, but, depending on the composite, it affected the microhardness.